HQ-9 vs Akash vs S-400: Air Defense Systems
A Comparative Analysis of Air Defense Systems with Insights from Operation Sindoor
In the evolving landscape of modern warfare, air defense systems play a crucial role in securing a nation’s airspace against hostile intrusions. Among the prominent contenders in the current defense arena are China’s HQ-9, India’s Akash, and Russia’s S-400 Triumf. Each of these surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems represents a strategic attempt to counter aerial threats ranging from enemy jets and helicopters to UAVs and cruise missiles.
The recent Operation Sindoor conducted by India in 2025 has brought these systems under renewed scrutiny, especially due to the total failure of the HQ-9 deployed by Pakistan. This incident showcased the growing might of India’s indigenous capabilities and highlighted key gaps in imported Chinese systems.
This article provides a comprehensive comparison between the HQ-9, Akash, and S-400 air defense systems, delving into their technical specifications, real-world performance, and the lessons drawn from Operation Sindoor.
Read This: Project Kusha by DRDO: India’s Secretive Missile Defense Umbrella Unveiled
Overview of Air Defense Systems
HQ-9: China’s Flagship SAM System
The HQ-9 (Hongqi-9 or Red Banner 9) is a long-range SAM system developed by China. It is often considered to be heavily inspired by the Russian S-300 and the American Patriot system, blending elements from both.
Key Features:
- Range: Up to 200 km (HQ-9B variant)
- Target Types: Aircraft, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles
- Radar System: Type 120 low-altitude acquisition radar, HT-233 phased array radar
- Launch Platform: Truck-mounted vertical launchers
- Deployment: Used by China and exported to countries like Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Algeria, and Uzbekistan
Akash: India’s Indigenous Defense Triumph
The Akash missile system is a short-to-medium range SAM developed by India’s DRDO. It represents India’s push for self-reliance in defense technologies under the “Make in India” initiative.
Key Features:
- Range: 30–50 km (Akash NG variant)
- Target Types: Aircraft, helicopters, drones, subsonic cruise missiles
- Radar System: Rajendra phased array radar
- Launch Platform: Mobile launcher (tracked and wheeled)
- Deployment: Indian Army and Indian Air Force
S-400 Triumf: Russia’s Global Export Giant
The S-400 is widely regarded as one of the most advanced long-range SAM systems in the world. Developed by Russia’s Almaz-Antey, the S-400 has been inducted into the armed forces of multiple nations including India, Turkey, and China.
Key Features:
- Range: Up to 400 km (with 40N6 missile)
- Target Types: Aircraft, stealth fighters, cruise and ballistic missiles, drones
- Radar System: Multi-layered radar including 91N6E Big Bird and 92N6E Grave Stone
- Launch Platform: 5P85TE2/SE2 truck-mounted launchers
- Deployment: Russia, India, China, Turkey
Comparative Analysis: HQ-9 vs Akash vs S-400
| Feature | HQ-9 (China) | Akash (India) | S-400 (Russia) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range | 200 km (HQ-9B) | 30-50 km (Akash NG) | 400 km (40N6 missile) |
| Target Types | Aircraft, Missiles | Aircraft, Helicopters | Aircraft, Ballistic Missiles |
| Mobility | High | High (wheeled/tracked) | Very High |
| Radar Type | HT-233 | Rajendra 3D | Big Bird + Grave Stone |
| Indigenous Tech | Medium (hybrid tech) | High (fully indigenous) | Russian technology |
| Electronic Warfare | Vulnerable (as seen) | Moderate (growing) | Strong (multi-layered EW) |
| Combat Proven | Limited success | Successful domestically | Proven in Syria and Ukraine |
| Cost Efficiency | Moderate | High | Expensive |
Operation Sindoor: The Turning Point
In May 2025, India launched Operation Sindoor, a highly calculated precision strike deep within hostile territory. The mission aimed to neutralize enemy infrastructure and surveillance nodes that were aiding cross-border terrorism.
Indian Air Force bypassed and jammed Pakistan’s Chinese-supplied air defence systems, completing
the mission in just 23 minutes, demonstrating India’s technological edge.
Read This: Operation SINDOOR: The Rise of Aatmanirbhar Bharat in National Security
During this daring mission, Indian fighter jets penetrated deep into Pakistan’s airspace. Despite being equipped with the Chinese HQ-9 air defense system, Pakistan failed to detect or intercept the incoming jets and drones. The HQ-9 systems remained inactive or blind, rendering them ineffective during the critical window of the strike.
HQ-9’s Complete Failure
- No Radar Lock: The HQ-9 batteries failed to establish a radar lock on Indian aircraft.
- EW Disruption: Indian electronic warfare aircraft effectively jammed the radar nodes of the HQ-9.
- Drone Evasion: Indigenous Indian drones confused and bypassed the Chinese radar systems, disabling their early warning mechanism.
- Outcome: Pakistan’s HQ-9 systems were described by military analysts as “sleeping giants that never woke up.”
Akash and India’s Growing Air Defense Web
While Akash systems were not directly used in Operation Sindoor, the success of the strike is a testament to India’s broader defense ecosystem. The Akash has proven effective in peacetime and battlefield simulations across various terrains, from deserts to high altitudes.
Strengths of Akash:
- Fully indigenous – eliminates dependency on foreign suppliers.
- Modular and mobile – can be rapidly deployed to different sectors.
- Continuous upgrades – including Akash-NG with better radar, range, and accuracy.
S-400 in Indian Service: Strategic Gamechanger
India’s acquisition of the S-400 system from Russia has significantly boosted its air defense capabilities.
- Layered Defense: Complements short-range systems like Akash and MR-SAMs.
- Strategic Deterrent: Covers large swathes of Indian airspace including sensitive border regions.
- Counter-Stealth: Capable of detecting and neutralizing stealth aircraft like F-35 and J-20.
Although the S-400 wasn’t involved in Operation Sindoor, its mere presence acts as a strategic umbrella against any retaliatory actions from adversaries.
Lessons from Operation Sindoor
1. Indigenous Superiority
Operation Sindoor showed that indigenous platforms, if backed by solid R&D and real-time battlefield innovation, can outperform imported systems like HQ-9. The success of Indian electronic warfare suites, surveillance drones, and signal intelligence was evident.
2. Reliability Over Hype
Despite being marketed as a high-tech defense system, the HQ-9 failed completely when put to test in combat conditions. In contrast, India’s homegrown technologies delivered precision, stealth, and speed.
3. Future of Air Defense
The world is moving towards AI-powered SAM systems, integrated radar networks, and hypersonic threat detection. India is already working on these next-gen capabilities, which will likely outperform legacy systems like HQ-9 in the near future.
Conclusion
The HQ-9, Akash, and S-400 all serve different roles in their respective nations’ air defense architectures. However, Operation Sindoor served as a live battlefield test—one that HQ-9 failed and India’s defense apparatus passed with flying colors.
- The HQ-9’s total failure under electronic warfare pressure raises serious doubts about its reliability.
- The Akash system, while shorter in range, remains a robust indigenous option with great strategic potential.
- The S-400 continues to dominate as the world’s most advanced long-range SAM system.
As India moves forward, a combination of indigenous innovation (Akash, Astra, XRSAM) and strategic imports (like S-400) ensures that the country remains a formidable force in air defense technology, setting new benchmarks as demonstrated in Operation Sindoor.
